Saturday, February 28, 2009

Atheist Revolution

Atheist Revolution

What is the Atheist Stereotype?

Posted: 28 Feb 2009 09:30 AM PST

Friendly Atheist recently wrote a post asking readers about whether they fit the atheist stereotype. Interesting question except that I'm not sure I know what the stereotype is. He seemed to assume that we would know what he meant because he said no more than "evil, angry, militant, immoral." What exactly is the atheist stereotype, or is this all there is to it?

Subscribe to Atheist Revolution

Words of Wisdom: Stephen Jay Gould

Posted: 28 Feb 2009 02:52 AM PST

Skepticism is the agent of reason against organized irrationalism and is therefore one of the keys to human social and civic decency.
- Stephen Jay Gould in the foreword to Michael Shermer's Why People Believe Weird Things.

Subscribe to Atheist Revolution

Friday, February 27, 2009

Atheist Revolution

Atheist Revolution

Dobson Resigns From Focus on the Family

Posted: 27 Feb 2009 12:26 PM PST

Thanks to Pam's House Blend for this breaking news: It appears that Christian extremist James Dobson has resigned from the board of Focus on the Family. According to the Associated Press:
Dobson has a devoted following. His radio broadcast reaches an estimated 1.5 million U.S. listeners daily. Yet critics say his influence is waning, pointing to evangelicals pushing to broaden the movement's agenda beyond abortion, gay marriage and other issues Dobson views as most vital.
Subscribe to Atheist Revolution

Need a Christian Extremist Trucking Company?

Posted: 27 Feb 2009 08:56 AM PST

If you own a business, you probably have a need to ship items. You might use UPS or FedEx to ship small items, but depending on the nature of your business, you might have a need for a trucking company that can handle large time-sensitive loads. Fortunately, there are many trucking companies that would be happy for your business. But what if you are a Christian extremist who simply cannot do business with anyone who does not share your values and need to proselytize constantly? What if you need a Christian trucking company willing to plaster all their trucks with pro-Jesus slogans? Well, I have good news for you.

Ship with Sam wants your business, and they "attribute our superior service to an unconditional commitment to our core set of values." Not just any values, mind you, but the sort of Christian values not bothered by using their trucks to proselytize. You see, Ship with Sam is not just a trucking company but a ministry.
Our main focus at Sam Kholi transport

Is To present to the world that Jesus Christ is lord not a swear word.

If you notice on our trailers you will see the name of Jesus Christ. Our heart yearns for the world to know that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior. Hollywood has portrayed a different image, an image that portrays Jesus Christ as trash as a bad word. The Most Holy, the Most Majestic created our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, and our mission is to use trucking to spread the word to America and God willing all the way to England.
When a run of the mill Christian trucking company is not nauseatingly evangelical enough, consider Ship with Sam. And for those thinking that this is some sort of hoax, I don't blame you. After all, whoever created their website misspelled the state in which they are based, Montana. However, one of these trucks was recently sighted near Vicksburg, Mississippi.

Subscribe to Atheist Revolution

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Atheist Revolution

Atheist Revolution

Time to Reject the Non-Apology Apology

Posted: 26 Feb 2009 03:08 AM PST

"I'm sorry." Why is that such a difficult thing to say? It used to be that "I'm sorry" meant that the speaker was remorseful, that he or she regretted something. An apology used to involve taking responsibility for something one had done or said. Granted, we have always questioned the sincerity of many high-profile public apologies, but having to question whether what we heard was actually an apology is a recent phenomenon. As far as this author is concerned, it is also a phenomenon which needs to end.

I see no need to pick on Rupert Murdoch right now. I already have a very low opinion of the man, and the saga of the New York Post cartoon does little to make it any worse. Besides, Murdoch is not the only one do give the non-apology apology; he's simply the latest in a long list of public figures.

Remember, Rep. Monique Davis (D-Chicago), the anti-atheist bigot who berated activist Rob Sherman on the floor of the Illinois legislature? She too gave a non-apology apology. The media, and even Mr. Sherman, allowed her to get away with it.

Saying that one is sorry if someone was offended is not an apology. It externalizes responsibility for one's behavior and places it on the audience. The person making such an apology is essentially saying, "It is too bad that you are upset." This may be a nice sentiment, but it is not an apology.

As long as we allow public figures to get away with the non-apology apology, they will continue to do so. This is why I hope we do not let Murdoch get away with it.

Subscribe to Atheist Revolution


Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Atheist Revolution

Atheist Revolution

Tell Ottawa to Allow Atheist Bus Ads

Posted: 25 Feb 2009 03:24 AM PST

City of OttawaImage via Wikipedia

I happen to think that the atheist bus ads appearing in many major cities around the world are a great idea, and I would like to see even more of them. Unfortunately, some cities have rejected the ads. I am posting the following at the request of a reader from Ottawa, Canada, one such city. It sounds like there is a reasonable chance that they will reconsider the ads if they hear from enough of us. I'm no Pharyngula, but I'd like to bring this to the attention of as many people as I can.

As I am sure you already know, Ottawa, Canada has rejected the "there probably is not god" bus ads. The good news is that City Councillor Alex Cullen will be moving to repeal the decision at the Council's March 11 meeting. I've asked him what I could do to help and he advised contacting the other Council members before the meeting,
asking them to allow the ads to be displayed.

As I am sure you know, the more people we have contacting them, the better. I have already posted on Atheist Nexus, but you have a great deal of readers and would be able to reach far more people than I ever could. I was hoping that you would consider posting about Ottawa's March 11 Council meeting and ask people to contact the Councillors.

Here is a link to the Councillors' contact information:
http://www.ottawa.ca/city_hall/mayor_council/councillors/index_en.html

To make things really easy, I've pulled together all their e-mail addresses:
Georges.Bedard@ottawa.ca, Michel.Bellemare@ottawa.ca,
Rainer.Bloess@ottawa.ca, Glenn.Brooks@ottawa.ca,
rick.chiarelli@ottawa.ca, Diane.Deans@ottawa.ca,
Steve.Desroches@ottawa.ca, Clive.Doucet@ottawa.ca,
Eli.El-Chantiry@ottawa.ca, Peggy.Feltmate@ottawa.ca,
Jan.Harder@ottawa.ca, Diane.Holmes@ottawa.ca, Peter.Hume@ottawa.ca,
Gord.Hunter@ottawa.ca, Rob.Jellett@ottawa.ca, Kitchissippi@ottawa.ca,
Jacques.Legendre@ottawa.ca, Maria.Mcrae@ottawa.ca,
Bob.Monette@ottawa.ca, Shad.Qadri@ottawa.ca, Doug.Thompson@ottawa.ca,
Marianne.Wilkinson@ottawa.ca, Alex.Cullen@ottawa.ca

Thank you very much for considering my request. Here's hoping for good
news on March 12!
I imagine that this is the sort of effort we will need to do more of if we want to see more of these bus ads.

Subscribe to Atheist Revolution


Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Atheist Revolution

Atheist Revolution

We Don't Need No Stinkin' Health Care

Posted: 24 Feb 2009 04:27 AM PST

Adequate ventilation has also been regarded as...Image via Wikipedia

Think how much money could be saved if the entire U.S. health care system was dismantled. No more Medicare or Medicaid. No more employer-supported health care for workers. No more expensive hospitals. Eliminating all health care spending would leave vast sums which could be redirected elsewhere. Taxes could be significantly reduced across the board. Sound like a far-fetched Republican wet-dream? No, we could go way beyond what even the most rabid Republican would want. We could eliminate health care completely - nobody would have access regardless of how much money they had. If this does not sound very appealing, that is because you have not read Time recently.

In the cover story of what can hardly be called a fringe publication, Jeffry Kluger offers us the following:
Here's what's surprising: a growing body of scientific evidence suggests that faith may indeed bring us health. People who attend religious services do have a lower risk of dying in any one year than people who don't attend. People who believe in a loving God fare better after a diagnosis of illness than people who believe in a punitive God. No less a killer than AIDS will back off at least a bit when it's hit with a double-barreled blast of belief. "Even accounting for medications," says Dr. Gail Ironson, a professor of psychiatry and psychology at the University of Miami who studies HIV and religious belief, "spirituality predicts for better disease control."
Why are we continuing to waste money on health care when prayer is free and evidently quite effective? Did I mention that this is a cover story from Time? Why are we spending money on HIV/AIDS research? Granted, we're hardly spending anything, but even the little we are spending could be cut off and replaced with "a double-barreled blast of belief."

And why stop at health care? How come this isn't our economic stimulus package? We could have a faith-based economy! There would be no production costs whatsoever. How about eliminating the military and all defense spending, replacing it all with prayer?

Ladies and gentlemen, if I may indulge one more time: This is a cover story in Time Magazine!!! Does the media have no responsibility for spreading this sort of garbage?

H/T to The New Republic

Subscribe to Atheist Revolution

Monday, February 23, 2009

Atheist Revolution

Atheist Revolution

Reaching Out to Atheist College Students

Posted: 23 Feb 2009 07:05 AM CST

Higher educationImage via Wikipedia

Long-time readers know that I have repeatedly struggled with ways to foster a positive atmosphere for atheist students at the university where I work. I want to provide such students with a safe place where they can find reprieve from the religiously oppressive environment in which we find ourselves. At the same time, I am not particularly interested in going out of my way to alienate the numerous fundamentalists Christian students (and faculty) who walk the same halls of higher learning. I have always been wary of those who use their positions as educators to advance political agendas. The challenge, which remains largely unsolved, is how to provide a welcoming and safe environment for atheist students without alienating the Christians who are equally deserving of a positive learning environment.

You can imagine my delight in seeing that the Chronicle of Higher Education addressed this very topic. Surely I would find some assistance in this highly respected source.

After documenting the need for universities to attend to atheist students, the authors offer some tips for faculty and university administrators:
  • Create a welcoming environment for atheist students.
  • Include atheism in student programming.
  • Ensure that atheists can, like other students, explore their inner development.
  • Create safe spaces that are "atheist only" for students.
  • Look to other institutions for best practices.
  • I appreciate what they are saying, but these recommendations are simply too general to be of much value. What I want to know is how to create a welcoming and safe environment for atheist students. As an individual faculty member, what can I do to help?

    I recognize that many campuses have active groups for atheist students. I would be thrilled to serve as the faculty advisor to such a group, but I am not sure how interested students would even know to approach me about doing so. Clearly, I need to be more open about my atheism at work. I'm willing to do so, but I'm still not quite sure how best to do so.

    H/T to Friendly Atheist

    Subscribe to Atheist Revolution


    Sunday, February 22, 2009

    Atheist Revolution

    Atheist Revolution

    How to Select a Psychologist or Counselor: A Guide for Atheists

    Posted: 22 Feb 2009 08:39 AM CST

    Wundt group of reseachImage via Wikipedia

    I guess it was the title of Friendly Atheist's post ("Can You Avoid Religious Psychologists?") that struck a nerve and necessitated this response. As an atheist, it ticks me off when people spread misconceptions about atheists, and as I psychologist, I feel similarly when it comes to my profession. It is a hell of a lot harder to find a psychologist who will push religion on their clients than it is one who would never dream of doing so! I'd like to use Friendly Atheist's post as a springboard to give you some tips on selecting a mental health provider.


    A reader contacted Friendly Atheist and had the following to say:
    Something just happened that I'd like advice on (from you or your readers). My son has been diagnosed with ADHD by his pediatrician and I figured we'd go to a child psychologist for more info (an idea the pediatrician encouraged). I picked the closest one on my insurance's coverage list and set up an appointment.

    Luckily, we got an informational packet in the mail from this psychologist (actually a Licensed Professional Counselor) before we actually went to meet with her. Let me quote some of the things that were in her packet.

    The counselor's responsibilities are:
    * Spending personal time with the Lord
    * Praying for the client
    * Studying scriptures
    * Listening to client concerns, facts, feelings, faith position
    * Sharing scripture and personal walk appropriate to client concerns
    * Praying with the client, acknowledging God's available presence with him/her

    She holds a Master's degree in Religious Education from a Baptist theological seminary (in addition to other more valid sounding degrees). She signs off by saying, "I have already begun to pray for our times together…"

    I was dumbfounded by this. I mean, I do live in the Bible Belt, so I shouldn't have been surprised. But I am still dismayed that this person appeared on a list of medical providers supplied by my insurance company!

    I guess my question is, how do I keep this from happening again? (I cancelled the appointment, of course.) Do I need to call and explicitly ask each psychologist (or whatever other health care specialist) if their practice is based in reality or superstition?
    The reader did the right thing by canceling the appointment. Fortunately, this sort of thing is actually fairly easy to avoid. There are some nutjobs out there, but they are the minority. This is true even in the Bible Belt.

    First, I'd like to clarify some credentialing terminology. The provider described by the reader was a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) and not a psychologist. The LPC is a master's-level designation as opposed to the doctoral degree psychologists have. There are many excellent LPCs out there, and they are a cheaper alternative when one does not need the additional expertise of a psychologist.

    So when might one need the additional expertise of a psychologist? First, a psychologist will generally have more extensive research training than a master's level clinician. This does not necessarily mean they are better, but it does mean that they are more likely to operate as scientist-practitioners than master's-level clinicians who are going to focus on the practitioner side. The more complex the problem, the greater benefit can be derived from someone with this additional training. Second, psychologists can do psychological testing. I mention this not only because it is a critical difference but because it might be relevant to Friendly Atheist's reader. Medical doctors routinely overdiagnose ADHD, and psychological testing is likely to result in a more accurate diagnosis.

    For the atheist who needs a mental health professional, psychologist or counselor, I offer the following recommendations:
    • When first calling to schedule an appointment, inquire about the provider's degree and the institution from where the degree was obtained. Steer clear of anything that does not have "psychology" or "counseling" in the degree.
    • If the provider is an LPC, ask directly whether this person provides "Christian counseling." If so, move on. You are not asking whether the counselor is Christian but whether they provide "Christian counseling." This is an important difference and one which you are well advised to heed.
    • View the initial appointment as an opportunity to evaluate the provider. If you do not feel comfortable for any reason, ask for a referral and move on. Reputable providers tend to encourage this sort of evaluation - they want to make sure they can be helpful to you and that you feel comfortable with them.
    • Recognize that many mental health professionals will ask, on questionnaires or in person, something about your religious affiliation or the importance of spirituality in your life. They tend to do this to help understand your worldview and not to convert you. However, if the provider should make disparaging comments about your lack of religious participation, spirituality, and the like, move on. This represents a violation of the provider's own professional ethics, and you deserve better.
    • If you are seeking therapy and want to make sure that your provider will utilize scientifically-sound methods, look for someone who provides cognitive-behavioral therapy. Of all the therapeutic modalities, it has been researched the most extensively and has the most evidence supporting its efficacy.
    Subscribe to Atheist Revolution

    Saturday, February 21, 2009

    Atheist Revolution

    Atheist Revolution

    Antidote to Irrationality: The Southern Skeptical Society

    Posted: 21 Feb 2009 01:43 PM CST

    New Orleans, December 2004Image by K.Caylor via Flickr

    The Southeastern U.S. is a hotbed of Christian extremism, and many Southern states have shown little interest in adequately funding education. What are those of us in the region to do if we are interested in overcoming irrationality, promoting science education, and strengthening the wall of separation between church and state? In short, we need to organize, cat herding metaphor be damned.

    I am happy to report that efforts are underway to create the Southern Skeptical Society, a group from Southeast Mississippi to Orlando, Florida, interested in supporting science and reason in the Southern U.S. The group is now in its infancy, but the organizer is trying to spread the word and stimulate interest. Plans include acquiring a web domain name and obtaining non-profit status. In the meantime, those on facebook can find them at http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=51753147667.

    Subscribe to Atheist Revolution


    Friday, February 20, 2009

    Atheist Revolution

    Atheist Revolution

    If Prayer Worked...

    Posted: 20 Feb 2009 05:18 AM CST

    2ljooldImage by vjack via Flickr

    When someone claims that prayer works, the first thing we should ask is what the speaker means by "works" in this context. If I say that prayer works because engaging in prayer makes me feel better, I may be right. However, this is not usually what the religious claim. Instead, they want to posit something supernatural in between the prayer and my feeling better. They want to claim that their god(s) intervenes in some manner. They are also rarely content to limit the efficacy of prayer to simply making someone feel temporarily better. But does even the most devout religious person really believe that their prayers bring about divine intervention? Their behavior certainly suggests otherwise.

    Unreasonable Faith uses a recent comment in which the central question is framed for a nurse:
    Now I'd like to ask you a question… why did you go through all the necessary medical training if you believe that prayer can heal people?
    I have certainly blogged about this many times before, as has nearly every other atheist blogger with whom I am familiar. Still, I continue to find it a fascinating question. May that is because I have yet to hear a religious person answer sufficiently. (None of the following are sufficient answers: "God works in mysterious ways," "God helps those who help themselves," or "I don't claim to know the mind of god." Meaningless cliches? Yes. Sufficient responses? No).

    The question can be phrased a variety of ways:
    • If you believe in prayer, why do you have insurance?
    • If you believe in prayer, why do you invest?
    • If you believe in prayer, why do you have a burglar alarm?
    • If you believe in prayer, why do you see a doctor?
    The crux of the question is simple: If you truly believe that prayer works - works in the sense that your god intervenes in your life - why do you not behave as if you believed it?

    If "prayer works" means nothing other than the act of praying makes me feel better, I do not disagree. But if it means anything more than that, then those advocating the wonders of prayer should have no need for the reality-based alternatives to which they cling. And if it does not always work, work completely, or only works on the small matters, then what does this say about your god?

    Subscribe to Atheist Revolution


    Activate your Email Subscription to: Atheist Revolution

    Hello there,

    You recently requested an email subscription to Atheist Revolution. We can't wait to send the updates you want via email, so please click the following link to activate your subscription immediately:

    http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailconfirm?k=dQ8jCzMP2B&i=24688910

    (If the link above does not appear clickable or does not open a browser window when you click it, copy it and paste it into your web browser's Location bar.)